Monday, June 01, 2009
Right, Privilege or Responsibility
I'm talking about health care in America. Is health care a right, a privilege or a responsibility? The answer to this one question tells me a whole heck of a lot about you and your belief system.
Right, "noun":
that which is due to anyone by just claim, legal guarantees, moral principles, etc..
Privilege, "noun":
a grant to an individual, corporation, etc., of a special right or immunity, under certain conditions.
Responsibility, "noun":
Something for which one is responsible; a duty, obligation, or burden.
So now that the definitions are listed, which answer is the right one for you?
President Obama and many other politicians believe it is a right of every American to have accessible, affordable health care, regardless of the circumstances. I just want to know how one person can have the right to to take my income, through the form of taxes, to pay for their medical bills.
My neighbor could never legally or morally come to me directly and force me to pay for his hospital or doctor bill. His accepting medical care is his responsibility to pay for it but not by using my money. So how could health care for everyone regardless of circumstances possibly be anyone's right at all?
In other societies not built on the laws of a republic there are privileged classes where health care is probably truly a privilege. It doesn't work that way here. You do not need to be of a certain class or group or status in society to receive health care. Medicine is not only for the privileged in America, never has been. Anyone can walk into any hospital and receive emergency medical attention.
In this country health care is a responsibility. In fact, it is a responsibility in every country but some governments have taken on that responsibility. Some socialized countries have established a social fabric of health care aided, supported or managed by their governments because their citizens had determined that health care is a right. Those countries provide medical care "for free". But there is nothing that is "free" in the sense that there is a cost associated with everything. If you do not pay for it, someone else is. And I believe that if you use medical services, then you are the responsible party to pay for it. Not your neighbor.
It really is that simple to me. Health care is a responsibility period. You cannot demand that someone use their time and training to provide you with care if you do not intend to pay for it. Begging the government to take the "responsibility" for health care will not fix anyone's problems. You need to take that task upon yourself.
What, do you think the government should pay for everyone's life insurance, or car insurance or home owner's insurance? What about food. Surely no one can survive very long without food. Should the government be responsible for filling everyone's bellies to their satisfaction? Why not? If we want them to pay for our right to health care than surely we should have them paying for our right to food. Why is it any different?
We have already established too many entitlements in this country. Too much government doing too much private business. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid already the monster programs stretching out for decades and no way to pay for any of it. What is the point in adding another entitlement that will turn into another huge program and generate more incredible deficits? To give the people what they want? Phooey!
If people were smart enough to realize that politicians will tell you whatever you want to hear, perhaps there would be no need to worry about ever passing something as ridiculously stupid as national health care. But most people are not only stupid, they actually believe politicians when they are telling them something they want to believe. This program will be different. This time we will get it right.
Sure! And I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn.
OH
Right, "noun":
that which is due to anyone by just claim, legal guarantees, moral principles, etc..
Privilege, "noun":
a grant to an individual, corporation, etc., of a special right or immunity, under certain conditions.
Responsibility, "noun":
Something for which one is responsible; a duty, obligation, or burden.
So now that the definitions are listed, which answer is the right one for you?
President Obama and many other politicians believe it is a right of every American to have accessible, affordable health care, regardless of the circumstances. I just want to know how one person can have the right to to take my income, through the form of taxes, to pay for their medical bills.
My neighbor could never legally or morally come to me directly and force me to pay for his hospital or doctor bill. His accepting medical care is his responsibility to pay for it but not by using my money. So how could health care for everyone regardless of circumstances possibly be anyone's right at all?
In other societies not built on the laws of a republic there are privileged classes where health care is probably truly a privilege. It doesn't work that way here. You do not need to be of a certain class or group or status in society to receive health care. Medicine is not only for the privileged in America, never has been. Anyone can walk into any hospital and receive emergency medical attention.
In this country health care is a responsibility. In fact, it is a responsibility in every country but some governments have taken on that responsibility. Some socialized countries have established a social fabric of health care aided, supported or managed by their governments because their citizens had determined that health care is a right. Those countries provide medical care "for free". But there is nothing that is "free" in the sense that there is a cost associated with everything. If you do not pay for it, someone else is. And I believe that if you use medical services, then you are the responsible party to pay for it. Not your neighbor.
It really is that simple to me. Health care is a responsibility period. You cannot demand that someone use their time and training to provide you with care if you do not intend to pay for it. Begging the government to take the "responsibility" for health care will not fix anyone's problems. You need to take that task upon yourself.
What, do you think the government should pay for everyone's life insurance, or car insurance or home owner's insurance? What about food. Surely no one can survive very long without food. Should the government be responsible for filling everyone's bellies to their satisfaction? Why not? If we want them to pay for our right to health care than surely we should have them paying for our right to food. Why is it any different?
We have already established too many entitlements in this country. Too much government doing too much private business. Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid already the monster programs stretching out for decades and no way to pay for any of it. What is the point in adding another entitlement that will turn into another huge program and generate more incredible deficits? To give the people what they want? Phooey!
If people were smart enough to realize that politicians will tell you whatever you want to hear, perhaps there would be no need to worry about ever passing something as ridiculously stupid as national health care. But most people are not only stupid, they actually believe politicians when they are telling them something they want to believe. This program will be different. This time we will get it right.
Sure! And I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn.
OH
# posted by OH @ 11:52 AM 
